Dynamics and Implications of Joint Custody of Children in India

by

This article on “Dynamics and Implications of Joint Custody of Children in India” was written by Gutta Eekshitha, a student of Lovely Professional University,

Abstract

“It isn’t about the mother’s or father’s rights. It’s about a child’s right to be happy, safe, and loved.”

This is what our Indian judiciary believed at the time of granting Custody post-divorce. In order to ensure that both parents remain involved in their children’s lives after a divorce or legal separation, joint custody has recently received a lot of attention as an alternative to standard sole custody agreements. India’s sociocultural environment and legal system offer a distinctive setting for examining the difficulties of shared custody. I examine how economic variables, legal frameworks, and cultural norms affect parenting practices, providing insight into the many ways that parents choose to achieve shared parenting obligations. I investigate the effects on children in shared custody, looking at their well-being, educational paths, and emotional fortitude.

Key Words

Joint Custody, Children, Implications, Dynamics, Indian Society

Aims and Objectives

To Understand the Dynamics: To explore and understand the various dynamics and factors that influence the adoption and functioning of joint custody arrangements among parents in India.

To Examine Implications: To examine the implications of joint custody on the well-being, emotional development, and academic performance of children in India.

To Analyze Legal Framework: To analyze the existing legal framework in India related to joint custody and assess its effectiveness and relevance in the context of Indian society.

To Investigate Parental Perspectives: To investigate the perspectives and experiences of divorced or separated parents engaged in joint custody arrangements, including their motivations,

Research Questions

  • What are the factors influencing the choice of joint custody in India?
  • How does joint custody impact children’s well-being and development in the Indian context?
  • What legal and social challenges are associated with joint custody in India?

Research Methodology

  • Review existing literature on joint custody in India and relevant Case Laws.
  • Identify gaps in the literature that my research can address.
  • Familiarize with legal, psychological, and sociological perspectives on the topic.

Literature Review

The literature on the dynamics and implications of joint custody of children in India is both diverse and complex, reflecting the multifaceted nature of this issue.

  • The research paper titled “Guardianship and Custody Laws in India- Suggested Reforms from Global Angle” provides a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding joint custody in India. The paper emphasizes the “Best Interest of the Child / Welfare of the Child” as the paramount consideration in adjudicating custody and guardianship matters. It also highlights a landmark ruling by the Karnataka High Court that both parents are entitled to get ‘joint custody’ “for the sustainable growth of the minor child”².
  • Another significant contribution to this field is the research paper “Custody of child in Indian law: issues and responses” published in the Burnished Law Journal. This paper discusses various aspects of child custody in Indian law, including the difference between custody and guardianship, and the concept of joint custody. It also provides an insightful discussion on how joint custody can provide a safe and fulfilling environment for children.
  • The research article “Custody of Children in India-An Inter-Country Dispute” sheds light on the challenges faced in enforcing foreign court orders related to child custody in India. This highlights the complexities involved in child custody matters, especially in cases involving parents from different countries.

These papers collectively provide a rich understanding of the dynamics and implications of joint custody in India. However, there is a need for more empirical research to understand the lived experiences of children under joint custody and how it impacts their well-being and development.

Introduction

The institution of family, as the fundamental unit of society, plays a pivotal role in the upbringing and development of children. In recent years, the traditional structure of the Indian family has been undergoing significant changes, with an increasing number of families facing the complexities of divorce and separation. One of the most critical aspects in these situations is the custody of children, with joint custody emerging as a viable alternative to sole custody. This research paper aims to delve into the dynamics and implications of joint custody in India, focusing on three key areas.

Firstly, we will explore the factors influencing the choice of joint custody in India. This includes an examination of socio-cultural norms, legal provisions, economic conditions, and individual family circumstances that play a role in determining the preference for joint custody.

Secondly, we will investigate how joint custody impacts children’s well-being and development within the Indian context. We will consider various dimensions such as emotional health, academic performance, social relationships, and overall life satisfaction.

Lastly, we will identify and discuss the legal and social challenges associated with joint custody in India. This includes issues related to legal procedures, societal attitudes, enforcement mechanisms, and support systems for families opting for joint custody. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to contribute to a better understanding of joint custody in India and provide insights that could inform policymaking and practice in this area.

Background

The concept of joint custody in India has evolved over time, influenced by both societal changes and legal developments. The Guardians and Wards Act of 1890, which applies to all citizens of the country, is the primary law governing child custody. However, the term ‘joint custody’ is not expressly stated in this Act or in personal laws.

Historically, in the classic Hindu law, the Karta (head of the family) was the unquestioned custodian and guardian of the dependents of the family. Therefore, a separate statute or clause for custody or guardianship was not given much emphasis. However, with societal changes and the emergence of nuclear families, issues related to child custody started gaining importance¹.

The concept of joint custody started gaining recognition in Indian courts even though it was not explicitly mentioned in the law. The Karnataka High Court, in a ruling on 13th September 2013, stated that both parents are entitled to get ‘joint custody’ for the sustainable growth of the minor child. This marked a significant step towards acknowledging joint custody in India.

Despite these developments, joint custody remains a complex issue in India due to various factors such as socio-cultural norms, economic conditions, and individual family circumstances. Further research and legal reforms are needed to fully understand and address the dynamics and implications of joint custody in India.

Joint Custody

Joint custody is a legal term that refers to a child custody arrangement where both parents share equal responsibility and rights in raising their child after a divorce or separation. This concept is rooted in the belief that maintaining strong relationships with both parents is in the child’s best interest.

Joint custody can be further divided into two types: joint legal custody and joint physical custody. Joint legal custody refers to a situation where both parents share decision-making responsibilities about the child’s upbringing, including decisions about education, healthcare, and religious upbringing. On the other hand, joint physical custody refers to an arrangement where the child spends substantial time living with each parent.

The concept of joint custody has evolved over time, influenced by societal changes and legal developments. Historically, in many societies, one parent (usually the mother) was granted sole custody of the children after a divorce. However, over time, the recognition of the importance of both parents in a child’s life led to the emergence of joint custody as a viable alternative.

Joint custody offers several benefits. Firstly, it allows children to maintain strong relationships with both parents, which can provide emotional stability and support. Secondly, it encourages parents to cooperate and communicate effectively for the welfare of their child. Lastly, joint custody can reduce feelings of loss or abandonment that children might experience in sole custody arrangements.

Despite its benefits, joint custody also presents several challenges. Coordinating schedules, maintaining consistent parenting styles, and managing potential conflicts can be difficult. The success of joint custody largely depends on the ability of parents to put aside their differences and work together for their child’s best interest.

In some cases, joint custody may not be the best solution. Factors such as domestic violence, substance abuse, or a significant distance between parent’s residences may make other forms of custody more appropriate. Therefore, it’s important for courts and families to consider all factors when deciding on a custody arrangement.

In conclusion, joint custody represents a shift from traditional views of post-separation parenting towards a more balanced approach. It acknowledges the importance of both parents in a child’s life and aims to ensure that children have continued relationships with both parents after a divorce or separation. However, it also requires effective communication and cooperation between parents, making it a complex yet potentially beneficial arrangement.

Provisions related to Joint Custody

In India, the primary law governing child custody is the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890, which applies to all citizens of the country. This Act is primarily secular in nature. However, the term ‘joint custody’ is not expressly stated in this Act or in personal laws.

Under the Hindu Law, Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and Section 38 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, along with the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, are relevant to child custody. As per these provisions, both parents have equal rights over a minor child after divorce. However, the family court gets the last say in this regard.

While there are no legal provisions specifically on joint custody, the judiciary has been taking steps to bring about joint custody in India. In joint custody arrangements, both parents have equal physical and legal custody. The judiciary’s move towards joint custody aims to ensure that children can benefit from having both parents as active members in their lives.

It’s important to note that the court’s decision on custody is always based on the best interests of the child. If the court feels it is in the best interest of the child not to be in the custody of both/either of the parents, then the court can give his/her custody to a third person as well.

Factors influencing the choice of joint custody in India

  1. Personal Law: The personal law to which the minor is subjected plays a significant role in determining the choice of joint custody.
  2. Age, Sex, and Religion of the Minor: These aspects of the minor’s identity can influence the decision for joint custody.
  3. Character and Capacity of the Proposed Guardian: The character and capacity of the proposed guardian, as well as their nearness of kin to the minor, are important considerations.
  4. Wishes of a Deceased Parent: If expressed, the wishes of a deceased parent can influence the choice of joint custody.
  5. Existing or Previous Relations: Any existing or previous relations of the proposed guardian with the minor or his property can also impact the decision.

It’s important to note that while these factors can influence the choice of joint custody, the ultimate decision is always based on what is in the best interest of the child.

Impact of Joint Custody on children’s wellbeing development

The impact of joint custody on children’s well-being and development can vary greatly depending on the specific circumstances of each case. Here are some general observations based on various studies:

  1. Continued Involvement of Both Parents: Joint physical custody is characterized by the continued involvement of both parents in their children’s lives. This arrangement is believed to compensate for the negative effects of family dissolution and contribute to children’s well-being in post-separation families.
  2. Children’s Well-being: Some research suggests that children living in joint physical custody (JPC) families fare significantly better than children living in sole physical custody (SPC) families on various dimensions of well-being.
  3. Stress Levels: A study found no significant association between the type of physical custody (sole vs. joint) and the children’s levels of stress². It also revealed that children’s experiences of stress did not depend on how often they moved between their parents’ households.
  4. Adjustment Challenges: On the other hand, joint custody can present challenges for children. They may need to adjust to living in two places and dealing with two different adults⁴. This can sometimes lead to difficulties and even chaos.

In the Indian context, the impact of joint custody can be influenced by various factors such as socio-cultural norms, economic conditions, and individual family circumstances. It’s important to note that while these findings provide some insights, they may not fully represent every child’s experience in a joint custody arrangement. The ultimate goal should always be to ensure the best interest of the child.

Joint custody in India, while beneficial in many ways, does face several legal and social challenges:

Legal And Social Challenges

Legal Challenges:

  1. Lack of Explicit Legal Provisions: The term ‘joint custody’ is not expressly stated in the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890 or in personal laws. This lack of explicit legal provisions can create ambiguity and inconsistency in court decisions.
  2. Complex Legal Procedures: Navigating the legal system can be complex and daunting for parents. This includes understanding the legal terminology, filing the correct paperwork, and presenting their case effectively.
  3. Enforcement of Custody Orders: Ensuring compliance with custody orders can be challenging. There may be issues related to the enforcement of visitation rights, handover of the child, and adherence to agreed-upon arrangements.

Social Challenges:

  1. Societal Attitudes: Societal attitudes and biases can influence perceptions about joint custody. For instance, there may be a bias towards mothers in custody decisions, or a stigma associated with divorce and joint custody arrangements.
  2. Economic Conditions: Economic conditions can also impact joint custody arrangements. For example, if one parent is financially unstable, it may affect their ability to provide for the child during their custodial time.
  3. Logistical Issues: Joint custody requires parents to coordinate schedules, maintain consistent parenting styles, and manage potential conflicts. These logistical issues can be challenging to navigate.

Despite these challenges, joint custody can still be a viable option for many families. It’s important that parents, legal practitioners, and policymakers work together to address these challenges and ensure that the best interests of the child are always prioritized.

Case Laws on Joint Custody of Child

The idea of joint custody for a minor child, while relatively new in India, is neither unknown nor forbidden. The Supreme Court, in the case of “K.M. Vinaya v. B.R. Srinivas” (2015) 16 SCC 405, ordered joint custody and guardianship of the minor child in the best interest of the child’s welfare. This judgment was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, which led to directions for joint custody of the minor child. Despite unsuccessful mediation efforts by the Court, the issue of shared parenting or joint custody and guardianship of the minor children Dipanshu Darshan and Suddhi remains relevant. A proactive approach by the Family Court in this regard would be most desirable. The judgment of “Aman Lohia v. Kiran Lohia” (2021) 5 SCC 489 provides some insight into the idea of joint parenting. In this case, while overturning the exparte judgment passed by the Family Court, the Supreme Court suggested that the concept of joint parenting could be discussed before the Family Court.

Concept of Hiba under Muslim law

Conclusion

Joint custody, a concept where both parents share equal responsibility and rights in raising their child post-divorce or separation, is a relatively new but increasingly recognized arrangement in India. It offers several benefits, including allowing children to maintain strong relationships with both parents, encouraging parental cooperation, and reducing feelings of loss or abandonment in children. However, it also presents challenges such as coordinating schedules, maintaining consistent parenting styles, and managing potential conflicts.

Despite these challenges, joint custody represents a shift from traditional views of post-separation parenting towards a more balanced approach. It acknowledges the importance of both parents in a child’s life and aims to ensure that children have continued relationships with both parents after a divorce or separation.

In India, while there are no explicit legal provisions for joint custody, the judiciary has been proactive in promoting this concept. The Guardians and Wards Act of 1890, the Hindu Marriage Act, of 1955, the Special Marriage Act, of 1954, and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, of 1956 are some of the laws that govern child custody. The court’s decision on custody is always based on the best interests of the child.

In conclusion, while joint custody is a complex yet potentially beneficial arrangement, it requires effective communication and cooperation between parents. It’s important for courts and families to consider all factors when deciding on a custody arrangement to ensure the best interest of the child is always prioritized.

References

Leave a Comment